Slaves to God

In 2 Peter 1:1, Peter says he is a “bondservant . . . of Jesus Christ.” Paul says the same thing in Titus 1:1. Or consider Romans 6:18-22:

18 And having been set free from sin, you became slaves of righteousness. 19 I speak in human terms because of the weakness of your flesh. For just as you presented your members as slaves of uncleanness, and of lawlessness leading to more lawlessness, so now present your members as slaves of righteousness for holiness.
20 For when you were slaves of sin, you were free in regard to righteousness. 21 What fruit did you have then in the things of which you are now ashamed? For the end of those things is death. 22 But now having been set free from sin, and having become slaves of God, you have your fruit to holiness, and the end, everlasting life. 23 For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.

How do we reconcile these claims of being slaves of God and Christ with what Paul says in Galatians 4:7, “Therefore you are no longer a slave but a son, and if a son, then an heir of God through Christ”? Or what Jesus says in John 15:15, “No longer do I call you servants, for the servant does not know what his master is doing; but I have called you friends, for all that I heard from My Father I have made known to you”?

The conflict is only apparent. Any biblical metaphor should not be overstretched, and in both passages we learn where the metaphor of being slaves to God breaks down. In Galatians 4, Paul is contrasting the adoption of Christians as sons of God with their being slaves to the elemental forces. We are no longer slaves to those ungodly powers, but sons of God, and therefore heirs of God through Christ. A slave didn’t expect to receive an inheritance from his master; he expected that inheritance to go the master’s son. Now we are sons, and we have an inheritance through Christ. In John 15:15, the point is the intimacy of the relationship. We have a connection with Christ that is one of privilege and honor and close friendship. But in the verse that immediately precedes that one, he said, “You are my friends if you do whatsoever I command you.” Slaves did not have an intimate relationship with their master, and our relationship to Jesus is in no way like that. What we learn from these two passage is that no biblical metaphor can be stretched in every detail. Are we slaves to God? Yes, but not in the sense that we have no inheritance. Are we slaves to Christ? Yes, but despite that fact, we have a unprecedented intimacy and close friendship with our Master.

See especially TDNT 2:275-6 and Murray J. Harris, Slave of Christ (Downers Grove, Ill.: IVP, 2001), 139-49.

Posted in Quodlibet | Leave a comment

On church membership

Here is a good word from the Second London Baptist Confession (1677), explaining one of the Biblical reasons for church membership:

“In the execution of this power wherewith he is so intrusted, the Lord Jesus calleth out of the World unto himself, through the Ministry of his word, by his Spirit [John 10:16; 12:32], those that are given unto him by his Father; that they may walk before him in all the [Matt 28:20] ways of obedience, which he prescribeth to them in his Word. Those thus called he commandeth to walk together in particular societies, or [Matt 18:15-20] Churches, for their mutual edification; and the due performance of that publick worship, which he requireth of them in the World.”

Posted in Doctrine of the Church | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Peter Williams on the accuracy of the Gospels

Contemporary religion scholars dismiss the historicity of the New Testament gospels. Peter Williams, a biblical scholar and the Director of the Tyndale House (Cambridge), offers compelling arguments for the accuracy of the eyewitness accounts in the canonical Gospels.

The fifty minute lecture is, as they say, time well spent.

Posted in Apologetics, Reliability of the Bible | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

How does faith save?

Thomas Watson explains how faith saves:

“If a man had a precious stone in a ring that could heal, we should say the ring heals; but properly it is not the ring, but he precious stone in the ring that heals. Thus faith saves and justifies, but it is not any inherent virtue in faith, but as it lays hold on Christ it justifies.” (Body of Divinity, 217)

Posted in Doctrine of Salvation, Thomas Watson | Leave a comment

Critique of Harold Camping and the end of the world on May 21st

Robert Godfrey of Westminster Seminary in California, though we would have some important differences with him on eschatology, has an excellent critique of Harold Camping and his teaching at the seminary’s faculty blog, “Valiant for Truth.” Especially helpful are Godfrey’s notes on Camping’s heresy of the church and salvation. Here are all the links:

Posted in Doctrine of End Times, Doctrine of Salvation, Doctrine of the Church, Robert Godfrey | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Spurgeon on the salvation of infants

On Sunday, April 10th, we discussed the doctrine of original sin, and with it I mentioned a message by Charles Haddon Spurgeon on the salvation of infants. His sermon is available at spurgeon.org.

Posted in Charles Haddon Spurgeon, Doctrine of Man and Sin | Leave a comment

D. A. Carson on the God of the OT vs the God of the NT

I mentioned this video in Sunday School on February 27th, while discussing the immutability of God. Here D. A. Carson answers the problem of reconciling the God of the Old Testament with the God of the New.

You can find more apologetic videos like this, addressing a whole host of issues, at ehrmanproject.org.

Posted in D. A. Carson, Doctrine of God | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Self-love and concupiscence … hold it back

One of Blaise Pascal’s “proofs” for Christianity:

The Christian’s God is a God who makes the soul aware that he is its sole good: that in him alone can it find peace; that only in loving him can it find joy: and who at the same time fills it with loathing for the obstacles which hold it back and prevent it from loving God with all its might. Self-love and concupiscence, which hold it back, are intolerable. This God makes the soul aware of this underlying self-love which is destroying it, and which he alone can cure. Pensees, 460 (544) (trans., Krailsheimer [New York: Penguin, 1966], 178.)

Posted in Blaise Pascal, Man's Chief End | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

R. C. Sproul on creation

Here’s a brief article by R. C. Sproul advocating a traditional understanding of creation that you might find helpful.

Posted in Doctrine of Man and Sin | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Jonathan Edwards on being a “watchman”

Last Tuesday night at our “Watchmen” men’s meeting, I mentioned a passage in a book about how Jonathan Edwards looked at himself as a “watchman” after the pattern of Ezekiel 3 in his preaching about the judgment of God.

The name of the book is Jonathan Edwards and the Ministry of the Word: A Model of Faith and Thought, by Doug Sweeney. Below is the passage I had in mind, all cited from the book:

——–

Edwards preached dozens of hellfire sermons during his thirty-five years of ministry, many of which survive. Like the Puritans before him, he did so in the manner of the ‘watchman’ of [Ezekiel 3:17-22], whom God held responsible to sound a trumpet clearly when his people were threatened with danger. . . .

This was serious business. Edwards believed that he was a watchman for the people in his care. He believed, as he proclaimed at one of his colleagues’ ordinations, that ‘ministers of the gospel have the precious and immortal souls of men committed to their care and trust by the Lord Jesus Christ.’ He believed in the words of Hebrews, as he said once in Northampton, that his ‘God is a Consuming fire that will burn up all that resist him.’ So he preached from time to time on the dangers of damnation. ‘If there be really a hell,’ he wrote in 1741,

of such dreadful, and never-ending torments, . . . that multitudes are in great danger of, and that the bigger part of men in Christian countries do actually from generation to generation fall into, for want of a sense of the terribleness of it, and their danger of it, and so for want of taking due care to avoid it; then why is it not proper for those that have the care of souls, to take great pains to make men sensible of it? Why should not they be told as much of the truth as can be? If I am in danger of going to hell, I should be glad to know as much as possibly I can of the dreadfulness of it: if I am very prone to neglect due care to avoid it, he does me the best kindness, that does most to represent to me the truth of the case, that sets forth my misery and danger in the liveliest manner.*

——–

*Douglas A. Sweeney, Jonathan Edwards and the Ministry of the Word, p. 134-6, citing Jonathan Edwards, “The Great Concern of a Watchman for Souls.”

Posted in Jonathan Edwards, Ministry | Leave a comment